Syria vote: MPs to decide whether to bomb IS targets
2 December 2015
- From the section UK Politics
MPs will decide later whether to back UK airstrikes in Syria directed against militants from so-called Islamic State.
A 10-hour House of Commons debate will culminate in a vote on whether the UK should join the US, France, Russia and others bombing targets in Raqqa, the group’s stronghold, and other areas.
UK prime minister David Cameron says IS is a threat to Britain’s security.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn opposes bombing but has given MPs a free vote amid divisions within his own ranks.
With up to 50 Labour MPs likely to back the government, and both the Democratic Unionist Party and the Liberal Democrats also giving their backing, Mr Cameron is expected to win parliamentary approval for the UK to intervene militarily in the four-year conflict in Syria.
- The latest on the Syria vote
- Syria air strikes: What you need to know
- Are there 70,000 Syrian ‘moderates’ ready to back UK?
- Where the UK’s parties stand on air strikes
The prime minister caused controversy on the eve of the vote by urging Tory MPs not to “sit on their hands” or “walk through the lobbies” with Mr Corbyn and others he described as “a bunch of terrorist sympathisers”.
Addressing a meeting of the 1922 Conservative backbench committee, Mr Cameron warned that if Tory MPs voted against airstrikes they risked undermining a strong message that the UK was standing alongside its allies already engaged in military action.
The BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the comments were a departure from the “carefully crafted” language that Mr Cameron has used on Syria over the past week.
They come amid reports that Downing Street – which has been trying to court Labour MPs – was keen to carry the vote through a combination of its own MPs and the party’s “natural allies”, such as the DUP.
A spokesman for Mr Corbyn said they were a “contemptible slur” and showed the prime minister was losing the argument.
The UK is already providing intelligence, surveillance and other logistical support to countries fighting Islamic State – also known as ISIL or Daesh – in Syria and the RAF has carried out thousands of raids on IS targets in Iraq since Parliament approved similar action there last year.
While the vast majority of Conservative MPs support the extension of airstrikes to Syria, the prime minister is likely to face tough questions about their scope, likely impact and how they fit into the “broader” political and diplomatic strategy the UK has promised to pursue to help stabilise and rebuild Syria.
In particular, Mr Cameron has been asked to explain his claim there are 70,000 moderate ground forces able to fight IS in Syria.
The run-up to Wednesday’s vote, which comes less than three weeks after 130 people were killed in a series of terror attacks in Paris, has been marked by a week of turmoil within Labour.
While Mr Corbyn has the support of the majority of his MPs, up to half of his shadow cabinet may vote in favour of bombing, including Shadow Foreign Secretary Hilary Benn and Deputy Leader Tom Watson.
The Labour leader has urged those who take a different view to him to “think again”, arguing that they must take account of public opinion and that 75% of Labour members polled by the party indicated they were opposed to air strikes.
BBC political correspondent Carole Walker said 110 MPs of all parties had signed their support for a motion opposing the government plans for airstrikes. Its backers believe they have a strong chance of forcing a vote on the motion, she added.
Wednesday’s normal parliamentary schedule, including prime minister’s questions, has been scrapped to accommodate a whole day’s debate on Syria, beginning at 11:30 GMT. A vote is expected some time around 22:00 GMT.
The government motion to be voted on would authorise air strikes “exclusively” against IS in Syria. It says military action is “only one component of a broader strategy” to tackle IS and the UK government would not deploy troops in “ground combat operations”.
- Can British forces make a difference in Syria?
- Russia’s missiles send robust signal
- Full coverage: Islamic State conflict
- For and against UK action in Syria
Labour’s leader has said bombing is not a sensible way to bring peace to Syria and party sources have claimed the number of their MPs likely to back the government is falling as the vote approaches.
Speaking on Tuesday, Mr Corbyn warned against the UK being drawn into another conflict in the Middle East and said Labour MPs should heed “what the implications are for this country”.
Rather than air strikes, Mr Corbyn said efforts should focus on a political settlement and achieving a “credible line of government” across Syria.
Analysis by BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg
Some nights in Westminster you can feel a crackle in the air, you can sense the tension, and sometimes even see the weight of responsibilities that MPs know they carry collectively in the looks on their faces. This is one of them.
According to the BBC’s latest research, of the 640 MPs expected to vote, 362 MPs are in favour of the motion while 175 are against. Of the remainder, 19 are “leaning to” supporting the government, three are “leaning against” while 80 are undecided.
SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon has confirmed her party’s 54 MPs will be opposing air strikes, saying bombing on its own will not rid the threat of terrorism or bring peace to Syria.
The SNP’s foreign affairs spokesman Alex Salmond said that, although the government appeared to have a comfortable majority, the number backing air strikes would be “less than the government is expecting”.
But the DUP has said its eight MPs will support airstrikes and Lib Dem leader Tim Farron has said action is justified as part of “a measured, legal and broad-based international effort to tackle the evil regime that has contributed to hundreds of thousands of desperate refugees, fleeing for their lives”.
MPs rejected air strikes against Syrian government targets in 2013, but ministers say it is “illogical” to carry out strikes in Iraq but not Syria as IS does not recognise the border between the countries.
The government has said it would only table a vote if it was confident of victory, pointing to the French government’s request for its military support and a UN resolution passed last month authorising “all necessary measures” to eradicate the safe haven established by IS in parts of Syria and Iraq.
But critics argue that without a wider strategy, more bombing will further destabilise Syria and play into the hands of extremists.
Thousands of protesters, led by the Stop the War coalition, took to the streets of London for the second time in four days on Tuesday to protest against bombing.
This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service – if this is your content and you’re reading it on someone else’s site, please read the FAQ at fivefilters.org/content-only/faq.php#publishers.